Left ventricular mass assessed by three‐dimensional echocardiography using rotational acquisition

Abstract

Limits for individual accuracy and reproducibility of LV mass estimates are nearly doubled using apical compared with "parasternal" 3-D echocardiography in vitro. A main advantage of "parasternal" 3-D compared with 2-D LV mass estimates is better reproducibility, but at the expense of greater time consumption. Apical 3-D technique is not superior to simpler 2-D methods based on "parasternal" short axis imaging.