Historical and linguistic evidence in favour of the relexification theory in the formation of creoles

Jan Voorhoeve

Language in Society · 1973 · 125 citations · 9 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study examines three Surinam Creoles, noting that SN and SM speakers arrived with basic Portuguese‑Creole knowledge. SM and SN were compared on basic vocabulary and linguistic features using historical evidence. SN fully relexified to English, SM only partly, ND arose from an 18th‑century English pidgin, showing that genetic evolution and relexification can produce similar outcomes, so comparative evidence alone is insufficient.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three different Creoles spoken in Surinam are examined for their Creole origins. Saramaccan (SM) and Sranan (SN) are compared on basic vocabulary and other linguistic features and analyzed in conjunction with historical evidence. It is suggested that SN and SM speakers came to Surinam plantations with a basic knowledge of Portuguese-Creole. SN completely relexified in the direction of English, whereas SM only partly relexified toward English. Evidence suggests that Ndjuka (ND) is not a product of relexification, but developed from an eighteenth-century English pidgin. It is concluded that both ‘normal’ genetic developments and relexification may have similar results and that comparative evidence alone is not a sufficient basis for historical conclusions (comparative linguistics, creoles, relexification).

References

9