British journal of surgery · 2007 · 209 citations · 15 references
MedicineRadiologySurgeryEarly DetectionUltrasonographyVascular SurgeryAneurysm RepairAneurysm SurgeryAortic Aneurysm RepairAortic ImagingAortic SurgeryVascular UltrasonographyAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm ScreeningAbdominal Aortic UltrasonographyAneurysm Rupture PreventionAortic Disease ScreeningRandomized Clinical TrialsStandard Of Care ComparatorsUltrasonographic Screening
BACKGROUND: Long-term benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are uncertain. These are the final results of a randomized controlled screening trial for AAA in men, updating those reported previously. Benefit and compliance over a median 15-year interval were examined. METHODS: One group of men were invited for ultrasonographic AAA screening, and another group, who received standard care, acted as controls. A total of 6040 men aged 65-80 years were randomized to one of the two groups. Outcome was monitored in terms of AAA-related events (surgery or death). RESULTS: In the group invited for screening, AAA-related mortality was reduced by 11 per cent (from 1.8 to 1.6 per cent, hazard ratio 0.89) over the follow-up interval. Screening detected an AAA in 170 patients; 17 of these died from an AAA-related cause, seven of which might have been preventable. The incidence of AAA rupture after an initially normal scan increased after 10 years of follow-up, but was still low overall (0.56 per 1000 person-years). CONCLUSION: Screening with a single ultrasonography scan still conferred a benefit at 15 years, although the results were not significant for this population size. Fewer than half of the AAA-related deaths in those screened positive could be prevented. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 00079388 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
15
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial
Jes S. Lindholt, Svend Juul, H Fasting et al. · BMJ · 2005 · 353 citations · Full text