American Antiquity · 1993 · 89 citations · 39 references
HumanitiesAnthropologyArchaeologyBioarchaeologyHistorical ArchaeologyPrehistoric ArchaeologyArchaeological ContextArchaeological Material CultureCultural HeritageNative American ArchaeologyPalaeolithic ArchaeologyPaleolithic ArchaeologyArchaeological SignificanceComparative Material CultureCulture ContactHistorical CultureRadiocarbon ChronologySalvage Archaeology Of BurialsTaphonomic InterpretationTraditional Material Culture
Most Arctic archaeologists believe that the people of the Thule culture, who arrived in the eastern Arctic approximately 1,000 years ago, met people of the Dorset culture and acquired important knowledge from them while replacing them in this region. The most convincing indication for technology transfer comes from the Thule adoption of Dorset harpoon-head styles. However, a review of radiocarbon dates, artifact styles, and site data reveals no conclusive evidence for face-to-face contact between the people of these two cultures. Given evidence that the Thule actively salvaged harpoon heads and carvings from abandoned Dorset sites, I contend that salvage was the sole means of contact between these cultures and the means by which harpoon-head technology was transferred. This example points out the importance of salvage as a mode of culture contact and the weakness of studies that interpret changes in material culture solely in a culture-historical context.
39
Formation processes of the archaeological record
Martin Bell · Journal of Archaeological Science · 1989 · 1.1K citations
John W. Rick · American Antiquity · 1989 · 910 citations
Humanities, Archaeology, History +11
Lewis R. Binford · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · 1982 · 699 citations