Publication | Open Access
Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting
310
Citations
239
References
2012
Year
Forecasting MethodologyHydrological PredictionEngineeringNeural Network Rainfall-runoffHydrologic EngineeringWater Quality ForecastingData ScienceSystems EngineeringHydroclimate ModelingHydrological ModelingNonlinear Time SeriesModular DesignGeographyFlood ForecastingOutstanding ChallengesForecastingHydrologyIntelligent ForecastingWater ResourcesCivil EngineeringStreamflow ModellingHydrological ScienceFlood Risk Management
Neural network river forecasting has evolved over two decades into a well‑established field, yet its operational use remains limited without reliable confidence intervals. The study calls for a coordinated effort to standardize input protocols, benchmark practices, and uncertainty quantification, aiming to unlock the full potential of neural network river forecasting. The authors highlight modular design, ensemble experiments, and hybridization with conventional hydrological models as emerging tools for decision‑making.
This paper traces two decades of neural network rainfall-runoff and streamflow modelling, collectively termed ‘river forecasting’. The field is now firmly established and the research community involved has much to offer hydrological science. First, however, it will be necessary to converge on more objective and consistent protocols for: selecting and treating inputs prior to model development; extracting physically meaningful insights from each proposed solution; and improving transparency in the benchmarking and reporting of experimental case studies. It is also clear that neural network river forecasting solutions will have limited appeal for operational purposes until confidence intervals can be attached to forecasts. Modular design, ensemble experiments, and hybridization with conventional hydrological models are yielding new tools for decision-making. The full potential for modelling complex hydrological systems, and for characterizing uncertainty, has yet to be realized. Further gains could also emerge from the provision of an agreed set of benchmark data sets and associated development of superior diagnostics for more rigorous intermodel evaluation. To achieve these goals will require a paradigm shift, such that the mass of individual isolated activities, focused on incremental technical refinement, is replaced by a more coordinated, problem-solving international research body.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1