Optimization and mediated bartering models for ground delay programs

Thomas Vossen, Michael O. Ball

Naval Research Logistics (NRL) · 2005 · 130 citations · 15 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) is a new air traffic flow management paradigm adopted by the FAA and airlines, enhancing Ground Delay Programs by improving slot allocation and exchange procedures. The paper aims to formalize CDM slot allocation and exchange procedures using optimization models to increase airline decision‑making control over economic trade‑offs. The authors model inter‑airline slot exchanges as a bartering process, solving an optimization problem for each exchange round, and compare this to current procedures. The comparison shows that the optimization‑based bartering model offers potential for greater airline decision‑making capability compared to the existing slot‑exchange procedure. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Naval Research Logistics, 2006.

Abstract

Abstract The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the airline community within the United States have adopted a new paradigm for air traffic flow management, called Collaborative Decision Making (CDM). A principal goal of CDM is shared decision‐making responsibility between the FAA and airlines, so as to increase airline control over decisions that involve economic tradeoffs. So far, CDM has primarily led to enhancements in the implementation of Ground Delay Programs, by changing procedures for allocating slots to airlines and exchanging slots between airlines. In this paper, we discuss how these procedures may be formalized through appropriately defined optimization models. In addition, we describe how inter‐airline slot exchanges may be viewed as a bartering process, in which each “round” of bartering requires the solution of an optimization problem. We compare the resulting optimization problem with the current procedure for exchanging slots and discuss possibilities for increased decision‐making capabilities by the airlines. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

References

15