Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

TLDR

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of transarterial Lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The study randomized 80 Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to receive cisplatin‑Lipiodol chemoembolization with gelatin‑sponge particles or symptomatic care, repeating treatment every 2–3 months with survival as the primary endpoint. Chemoembolization produced a marked tumor response and significantly improved actuarial survival (1‑year 57% vs 32%, 2‑year 31% vs 11%, 3‑year 26% vs 3%) with a relative risk of death 0.49, despite a higher incidence of liver‑failure deaths.

Abstract

This randomized, controlled trial assessed the efficacy of transarterial Lipiodol (Lipiodol Ultrafluide, Laboratoire Guerbet, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France) chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. From March 1996 to October 1997, 80 out of 279 Asian patients with newly diagnosed unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilled the entry criteria and randomly were assigned to treatment with chemoembolization using a variable dose of an emulsion of cisplatin in Lipiodol and gelatin-sponge particles injected through the hepatic artery (chemoembolization group, 40 patients) or symptomatic treatment (control group, 40 patients). One patient assigned to the control group secondarily was excluded because of unrecognized systemic metastasis. Chemoembolization was repeated every 2 to 3 months unless there was evidence of contraindications or progressive disease. Survival was the main end point. The chemoembolization group received a total of 192 courses of chemoembolization with a median of 4.5 (range, 1-15) courses per patient. Chemoembolization resulted in a marked tumor response, and the actuarial survival was significantly better in the chemoembolization group (1 year, 57%; 2 years, 31%; 3 years, 26%) than in the control group (1 year, 32%; 2 years, 11%; 3 years, 3%; P =.002). When adjustments for baseline variables that were prognostic on univariate analysis were made with a multivariate Cox model, the survival benefit of chemoembolization remained significant (relative risk of death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P =.006). Although death from liver failure was more frequent in patients who received chemoembolization, the liver functions of the survivors were not significantly different. In conclusion, in Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial Lipiodol chemoembolization significantly improves survival and is an effective form of treatment.