Race, residence, and leisure style: Some policy implications

Abstract

Abstract The relationships between race, residence, and leisure style are examined to ascertain if leisure differences are a consequence of subcultural diversity (ethnicity) or differential allocation of recreational resources (marginality). Findings obtained from a sample of urban blacks and whites indicate that ethnicity is a factor that should be considered in the planning and placement of public recreation programs. However, for blacks living in predominantly white residential settings, as opposed to an ethnic community, ethnicity does not appear to be an issue. Expectations of leisure needs are higher for this group, perhaps illustrating anticipatory socialization or compensation for limited informal leisure involvement. It is suggested that both the theoretical and policy implications of the marginality and ethnicity perspectives be re‐examined.