A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous or Oral Iron for Posttransplant Anemia in Kidney Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia after kidney transplantation has been associated with poor transplant outcomes. We hypothesized that intravenous (IV) iron may more rapidly correct anemia than oral (PO) iron. METHODS: One hundred four kidney transplant recipients were prospectively randomized to IV iron polymaltose (500 mg single dose) or PO ferrous sulfate (210 mg elemental iron daily, continuously). The primary outcome was time to resolution of anemia, defined as hemoglobin more than or equal to 11 g/dL. Secondary outcomes included infections, blood transfusions, gastrointestinal side-effects, and acute rejection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the primary outcome comparing IV with PO iron (hazards ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.83; P=0.32). The median time to resolution of anemia was 12 days in the IV group versus 21 days in the PO group. There were no differences in infections (20% vs. 24%, P=0.62), acute rejection (8% vs. 6%, P=0.68), blood transfusions (10% vs. 18%, P=0.24), and severe gastrointestinal side-effects (6% vs. 12%, P=0.29) between the IV iron and the PO iron groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a single dose of IV iron did not result in more rapid resolution of anemia compared with PO iron. Both IV and PO iron are safe and effective in the management of posttransplant anemia.