PROTEOMICS · 2005 · 54 citations · 42 references
MedicineBioinformaticsOncologyMachine LearningProstate DiseaseProteomicsCancer BiomarkersCancer ProteomicsProstate CancerProteomic BiomarkersTumor CharacterizationTumor ClassificationClinical Phenotype PredictionDisease Phenotype IdentificationFilteringMachine Learning Biomarker DiscoveryMachine Learning-based Biomarker DiscoveryNoise AnalysisProteomic ClassificationTumor Biomarker Discovery
We propose a novel method for phenotype identification involving a stringent noise analysis and filtering procedure followed by combining the results of several machine learning tools to produce a robust predictor. We illustrate our method on SELDI-TOF MS prostate cancer data (http://home.ccr.cancer.gov/ncifdaproteomics/ppatterns.asp). Our method identified 11 proteomic biomarkers and gave significantly improved predictions over previous analyses with these data. We were able to distinguish cancer from non-cancer cases with a sensitivity of 90.31% and a specificity of 98.81%. The proposed method can be generalized to multi-phenotype prediction and other types of data (e.g., microarray data).
42
Classification and Regression Trees.
Alexander Gordon, Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman et al. · Biometrics · 1984 · 23.9K citations
Classification and Regression Trees.
John Van Ryzin, Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman et al. · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1986 · 21K citations
Neural networks for pattern recognition
Choice Reviews Online · 1994 · 18.7K citations
In silico prediction of protein-protein interactions in human macrophages
Oussema Souiai, Fatma Z. Guerfali, Slimane Ben Miled et al. · BMC Research Notes · 2014 · 11K citations · Full text