The Economic Journal · 2007 · 375 citations · 34 references
This article explores parallels between the debate prompted by Pareto's reformulation of choice theory at the beginning of the twentieth century and current controversies about the status of behavioural economics. Before Pareto's reformulation, neoclassical economics was based on theoretical and experimental psychology, as behavioural economics now is. Current 'discovered preference' defences of rational-choice theory echo arguments made by Pareto. Both treat economics as a separate science of rational choice, independent of psychology. Both confront two fundamental problems: to find a defensible definition of the domain of economics, and to justify the assumption that preferences are consistent and stable. Copyright 2007 The Author(s). Journal compilation Royal Economic Society 2007.
34
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky · Econometrica · 1979 · 45.8K citations
The Handbook of experimental economics
Choice Reviews Online · 1995 · 3.7K citations
Psychology as the behaviorist views it.
John B. Watson · Psychological Review · 1913 · 3K citations
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
Bruno S. Frey, Alois Stutzer · Journal of Economic Literature · 2002 · 2.6K citations