BMC Urology · 2014 · 33 citations · 51 references
MedicineOncologyUrologyGenitourinary OncologySurgical OncologySurvival AnalysisCancer StagingCancer Survival AnalysisMalignant NeoplasmsProstate CancerProstate SurgeryRadical ProstatectomyCox RegressionDisease-specific SurvivalHazard RegressionKaplan-meier Confidence IntervalsPrognosis Of Prostate DiseaseProstate Cancer MortalityProstate Cancer PrognosisProstate-specific Antigen Doubling Time
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common male malignancy and a mayor cause of mortality in the western world. The impact of clinicopathological variables on disease related outcomes have mainly been reported from a few large US series, most of them not reporting on perineural infiltration. We therefore wanted to investigate relevant cancer outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in two Norwegian health regions with an emphasis on the impact of perineural infiltration (PNI) and prostate specific antigen- doubling time (PSA-DT). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 535 prostatectomy patients at three hospitals between 1995 and 2005 estimating biochemical failure- (BFFS), clinical failure- (CFFS) and prostate cancer death-free survival (PCDFS) with the Kaplan-Meier method. We investigated clinicopathological factors influencing risk of events using cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 89 months, 170 patients (32%) experienced biochemical failure (BF), 36 (7%) experienced clinical failure and 15 (3%) had died of prostate cancer. pT-Stage (p = 0.001), preoperative PSA (p = 0.047), Gleason Score (p = 0.032), non-apical positive surgical margins (PSM) (p = 0.003) and apical PSM (p = 0.031) were all independently associated to BFFS. Gleason score (p = 0.019), PNI (p = 0.012) and non-apical PSM (p = 0.002) were all independently associated to CFFS while only PNI (P = 0.047) and subgroups of Gleason score were independently associated to PCDFS. After BF, patients with a shorter PSA-DT had independent and significant worse event-free survivals than patients with PSA-DT > 15 months (PSA-DT = 3-9 months, CFFS HR = 6.44, p < 0.001, PCDFS HR = 13.7, p = 0.020; PSA-DT < 3 months, CFFS HR = 11.2, p < 0.001, PCDFS HR = 27.5, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: After prostatectomy, CFFS and PCDFS are variable, but both are strongly associated to Gleason score and PNI. In patients with BF, PSA-DT was most strongly associated to CF and PCD. Our study adds weight to the importance of PSA-DT and re-launches PNI as a strong prognosticator for clinically relevant endpoints.
51
Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical Prostatectomy
Charles R. Pound · JAMA · 1999 · 3.1K citations
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer
Anna Bill‐Axelson, Lars Holmberg, Mirja Ruutu et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 1.9K citations
Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer
Timothy J Wilt, Michael K. Brawer, Karen Jones et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 1.8K citations · Full text
International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates
Ahmedin Jemal, Joannie Lortet‐Tieulent, Elizabeth Ward et al. · European Urology · 2012 · 1.5K citations