Physical review. B, Condensed matter · 1979 · 1.1K citations · 14 references
Natural SciencesMaterials SciencePhysicsCondensed Matter PhysicsSemiconductor MaterialsSurface ScienceElectronic Band StructureOptical Properties Of SemiconductorsQuantum OptoelectronicsSemiconductor PhysicsConductionConduction BandDiamond SemiconductorsElectron AffinityElectron Density DistributionsQuantum Light EmissionSecondary Electron EmissionSurface States
Recent calculations predict occupied intrinsic surface states in the diamond (111) gap, but none were observed. The unreconstructed diamond (111) surface exhibits a negative electron affinity and a stable quantum yield that rises linearly from ~5.5 eV to ~20 % at 9 eV, reaching 40–70 % for 13–35 eV, with secondary electrons peaking at ~0.5 eV above the valence band maximum, while the measured photothreshold is significantly lower than theoretical predictions. No additional metadata.
Quantum photoyield and secondary-electron distributions are presented for an unreconstructed diamond (111) surface (type-$\mathrm{II}b$, gem-quality blue-white semiconductor). This chemically inert surface exhibits a negative electron affinity, resulting in a stable quantum yield that increases linearly from photothreshold (5.5 eV) to \ensuremath{\sim}20% at 9 eV, with a very large yield of \ensuremath{\sim}40%-70% for $13\ensuremath{\lesssim}h\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\lesssim}35$ eV. For all photon energies, secondary-electron energy distributions show a dominant \ensuremath{\sim}0.5-eV-wide emission peak at the conduction-band minimum (${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}^{min}=5.50\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ eV above the valence-band maximum ${{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$). In contrast with recent self-consistent calculations [J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 17, 769 (1978)] no occupied intrinsic surface states with ionization energies in the fundamental gap (the Fermi level was 1 eV above ${{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) were observed. Likewise, the measured photothreshold (${E}_{\mathrm{vac}}\ensuremath{-}{{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) is significantly smaller than calculated (7.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7 eV).
14