Ophelia · 1995 · 924 citations · 103 references
Life SciencesEcologyMarine EcologyNutrient CyclingPhycologyMarine Ecosystem DynamicsMarine Ecosystem FunctionNutrient LimitationPhytoplankton EcologySeagrass EcologyAquatic Vegetation ChangeCompetition Among MacroalgaeDominant SpeciesEcosystem Nutrient PoolsEutrophicationEutrophication DriversGrazing Under Nutrient LimitationNutrient Recycling
In eutrophication, increased nutrient loading shifts dominance from slow‑growing seagrasses and large macroalgae to fast‑growing macroalgae and ultimately phytoplankton, reflecting a transition from nutrient to light limitation and differing competitive strategies. The shift to fast‑growing macroalgae and phytoplankton accelerates nutrient transfer to heterotrophs, while recovery after nutrient reduction is very slow, with modelled times ranging from a few years for fast‑growing species to centuries for slow‑growing seagrasses.
Abstract Submerged vegetation respond to increased nutrient loading through a shift from slow-growing seagrasses and large macroalgae to fast-growing macroalgae, and the ultimate dominance of phytoplankton at high nutrient loadings. This shift reflects a change from nutrient to light limitation along the eutrophication gradient. Slow-growing seagrasses and large macroalgae are good competitors when nutrients are limiting because they have relatively low nutrient requirements, are able of efficient internal nutrient recycling, and can access the elevated nutrient pools in the sediment. Fast-growing macroalgae and phytoplankton are superior competitors when light is limiting because they are positioned closer to the water surface, and capture and use light more efficiently. The important ecosystem consequences of altered nutrient regimes derive from the shift in dominant vegetation types. Slow-growing seagrasses and large macroalgae are longevous, decompose slowly, and experience only moderate grazing losses, whereas the production of fast growing macroalgae and phytoplankton is transferred faster to heterotrophs, through increased grazing and decomposition rates. Recovery of submerged vegetation following nutrient reduction plans is a very slow process, which involves the replacement of fast-growing for slow-growing plants. Simulation models predict recovery times to oscillate between a few years for macroalgae and fast-growing seagrasses to centuries for slow-growing seagrasses following nutrient reduction plans.
103
A Functional Group Approach to the Structure of Algal-Dominated Communities
Robert S. Steneck, Megan N. Dethier · Oikos · 1994 · 1.2K citations
PK Dayton · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1985 · 873 citations
Carlos M. Duarte · Aquatic Botany · 1991 · 821 citations
John H. Martin, Michael Gordon, Steve E. Fitzwater · Limnology and Oceanography · 1991 · 722 citations · Full text