Rural geography: blurring boundaries and making connections

Michael Woods

Progress in Human Geography · 2009 · 325 citations · 51 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Recent commentaries reflect on rural geography’s history, practice, and uneven progress after a period of resurgence, raising concerns about its readiness to tackle new challenges. This article examines how rural geography is redefining its boundaries and forging connections with other disciplines. It does so by revisiting rural definitions, revitalizing rural‑urban linkages such as city regions and rurbanity, and exploring interdisciplinary collaborations with physical and natural scientists.

Abstract

A number of commentaries and articles have been published in recent years reflecting on the nature, history and practice of rural geography. The introspective mood follows a period in which rural geography has been widely considered to have been resurgent, but indicates concerns about the unevenness of progress in rural geography, and about the readiness of the subdiscipline to address new challenges. This article, the first of three progress reports on rural geography, focuses on attempts within these interventions to rethink the boundaries of rural geography and its connections with other fields of study. First, it examines renewed debates on the definition and delimitation of the rural, including efforts to rematerialize the rural. Second, it considers the rejuvenation of work on rural—urban linkages, including concepts of city regions, exurbanization and rurbanity. Third, it discusses the interdisciplinary engagement of rural geographers, including collaboration with physical and natural scientists.

References

51