Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic <i>versus</i> open appendicectomy in children

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appendicectomy is the most common emergency surgical operation in children. The aim of this study was to compare recovery after appendicectomy using either a laparoscopic or an open technique in children. METHODS: Sixty-one children aged 4-15 years undergoing appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis were studied. The study was prospective, randomized and single-blinded, with parallel groups. Standardized anaesthetic technique and pain management were used. The study endpoints were postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesia, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Children had significantly less pain after laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy 8 h after operation and on the first and second postoperative mornings (P < 0.05). Laparoscopic appendicectomy resulted in a reduced requirement for rescue analgesia with oxycodone in hospital: mean(s.d.) 3.6(2.5) versus 5.8(3.3) doses (mean difference 2.2 doses, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.6--3.8 doses); P = 0.01. The mean(s.d.) length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group: 1.9(0.7) versus 2.6(0.9) days (mean difference 0.7 days, 95 per cent c.i. 0.3--1.1 days); P = 0.001. Three children who had open appendicectomy developed a wound infection. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay than open appendicectomy in children undergoing surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis.