Publication | Closed Access
Multiobjective optimization for performance‐based seismic design of steel moment frame structures
129
Citations
11
References
2004
Year
EngineeringPerformance-based Building DesignMultidisciplinary Design OptimizationMechanical EngineeringStructural PerformanceStructural OptimizationMultiobjective OptimizationStructural SteelStructural SystemStructural EngineeringShip Structural DesignDesirable CompromiseDesignReinforced ConcreteStructural DesignStructural ReliabilityMultiobjective Genetic AlgorithmDesign ComplexityPerformance‐based Seismic DesignCivil EngineeringConstruction Engineering
The study formulates the performance‑based seismic design of steel SMRFs as a multiobjective optimization problem balancing initial capital investment and future seismic risk. The authors model construction cost via steel weight and section variety, and seismic risk via maximum interstory drift at 50% and 2% exceedance probabilities, then apply a multiobjective genetic algorithm to size members of a planar five‑story SMRF. The formulation enables engineers to identify design solutions that balance initial investment and seismic performance. © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract The performance‐based seismic design of steel special moment‐resisting frame (SMRF) structures is formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem, in which conflicting design criteria that respectively reflect the present capital investment and the future seismic risk are treated simultaneously as separate objectives other than stringent constraints. Specifically, the initial construction expenses are accounted for by the steel material weight as well as by the number of different standard steel section types, the latter roughly quantifying the degree of design complexity related additional construction cost; the seismic risk is considered in terms of maximum interstory drift demands at two hazard levels with exceedance probabilities being 50% and 2% in 50 years, respectively. The present formulation allows structural engineers to find an optimized design solution by explicitly striving for a desirable compromise between the initial investment and seismic performance. Member sizing for code‐compliant design of a planar five‐story four‐bay SMRF is presented as an application example using the proposed procedure that is automated by a multiobjective genetic algorithm. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1