Surgical Endoscopy · 2012 · 69 citations · 17 references
MedicineSurgeryElectrophysiologyGastroenterologyGastrointestinal PharmacotherapyEsophageal DiseasesFunctional Electrical StimulationGastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseNeurostimulationElectrical StimulationElectrical Stimulation ParametersGerd Symptom AssessmentHigh-resolution ManometryLower Esophageal Sphincter DysfunctionReflux EsophagitisStimulation Safety
BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) improves LES pressure without interfering with LES relaxation. The aim of this open-label pilot trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term LES stimulation using a permanently implanted LES stimulator in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: GERD patients who were at least partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with abnormal esophageal pH, hiatal hernia ≤ 3 cm, and esophagitis ≤ LA grade C were included. Bipolar stitch electrodes were placed in the LES and an IPG was placed in a subcutaneous pocket. Electrical stimulation was delivered at 20 Hz, 215 μs, 3-8 mA in 30 min sessions. The number and timing of sessions was tailored to each patient's GERD profile. Patients were evaluated using GERD-HRQL, daily symptom and medication diaries, SF-12, esophageal pH, and high-resolution manometry. RESULTS: 24 patients (mean age = 53 years, SD = 12 years; 14 men) were implanted; 23 completed their 6-month evaluation. Median GERD-HRQL scores at 6 months was 2.0 (IQR = 0-5.5) and was significantly better than both baseline on-PPI [9.0 (range = 6.0-10.0); p < 0.001] and off-PPI [23 (21-25); p < 0.001] GERD-HRQL. Median% 24-h esophageal pH < 4.0 at baseline was 10.1 and improved to 5.1 at 6 months (p < 0.001). At their 6-month follow-up, 91 % (21/23) of the patients were off PPI and had significantly better median GERD-HRQL on LES stimulation compared to their on-PPI GERD-HRQL at baseline (9.0 vs. 2.0; p < 0.001). There were no unanticipated implantation- or stimulation-related adverse events or untoward sensation due to stimulation. There were no reports of treatment-related dysphagia, and manometric swallow was also unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the LES is safe and effective for treating GERD. There is a significant and sustained improvement in GERD symptoms, esophageal pH, and reduction in PPI usage without any side effects with the therapy. Furthermore, the therapy can be optimized to address an individual patient's disease.
17
The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States
Robert S. Sandler, James E. Everhart, Mark Donowitz et al. · Gastroenterology · 2002 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Long-term Outcome of Medical and Surgical Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Stuart J. Spechler, Edward Lee, Dennis J. Ahnen et al. · JAMA · 2001 · 912 citations
Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Surgery +16
Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery vs Esomeprazole Treatment for Chronic GERD
Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk, Stephen Attwood, Christian Ell et al. · JAMA · 2011 · 416 citations
Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Surgery +14
Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery vs Esomeprazole Treatment for Chronic GERD
Jean–Paul Galmiche, Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk, Stephen Attwood et al. · 2011 · 303 citations
Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Surgery +14