What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?

TLDR

The paper builds on Pike, Rodríguez‑Pose, and Tomaney’s 2007 study of local and regional development. It seeks to determine what kinds of local and regional development exist and who benefits from them. The authors analyze the concepts, historical context, spatial dimensions, varieties, principles, and values of local and regional development, and examine how benefits and losses are unevenly distributed across space and society. They conclude that development models must be grounded in democratic, equitable, internationalist, and just principles, and that specific articulations are normative and contingent on social and political contexts.

Abstract

Pike A., Rodríguez-Pose A. and Tomaney J. (2007) What kind of local and regional development and for whom?, Regional Studies 41, 1253–1269. This paper asks the question, what kind of local and regional development and for whom? It examines what is meant by local and regional development, its historical context, its geographies in space, territory, place and scale and its different varieties, principles and values. The socially uneven and geographically differentiated distribution of who and where benefits and loses from particular forms of local and regional development is analysed. A holistic, progressive and sustainable version of local and regional development is outlined with reflections upon its limits and political renewal. Locally and regionally determined development models should not be developed independently of more foundational principles and values such as democracy, equity, internationalism and justice. Specific local and regional articulations are normative questions and subject to social determination and political choices in particular national and international contexts.