Philosophy of Science · 2001 · 45 citations · 18 references
HumanitiesPhilosophyPsychologyCognitive PsychologyEpistemologyPhilosophy Of ScienceCognitive ScienceObservation In SciencePhilosophy Of PerceptionVisual CognitionObjectivity In ObservationPerceptionPerception TheoryPerceptual TheoryProblem Of PerceptionPsychology Of PerceptionTheory-laden ObservationVision Theory
The aim of this paper is to analyze a philosophical question (neutrality vs. theoryladenness of observation) taking into consideration the empirical results of Cognitive Psychology (theories of perception). This is an important debate because the objectivity of science is at stake. In the Philosophy of Science there are two main positions with regard to observation, those of C. Hempel and N. R. Hanson. In the Philosophy of Mind there are also two important contrasting positions, those of J. Fodor and Paul M. Churchland. I will analyze the consequences of recent theories of perception and vision developed within Cognitive Science for classical epistemological theses about observation.
18
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
Humanities, History, Physics +17
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Marie Boas Hall, Thomas Kühn · The American Historical Review · 1963 · 7.6K citations
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.
Michael D. Resnik, Carl G. Hempel · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · 1966 · 3.4K citations
Paul K. Moser · International Philosophical Quarterly · 1987 · 1.8K citations
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.
Jeffrey S. Poland, Barbara Von Eckardt, Ronald N. Giere · The Philosophical Review · 1991 · 1.3K citations