Publication | Closed Access
Evaluating Management Zone Optimal Nitrogen Rates with a Crop Growth Model
78
Citations
54
References
2006
Year
Precision AgricultureEngineeringApplied EconomicsCropping SystemAgricultural EconomicsCrop Growth ModelYield PredictionSustainable AgriculturePublic HealthAgricultural ProductivityAgricultural EfficiencyCrop ProductionCrop YieldManagement ZoneCrop Growth ModelingN FertilizerOptimal N RateAgricultural ModelingFarming SystemsAgricultural ManagementCrop Modelling
Determining MZ (management zone)‐specific optimal N rate is a challenge in precision crop management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of applying a crop growth model to simulate corn ( Zea mays L.) yield at various N levels in different MZs and estimate optimal N rates based on long‐term weather conditions. Three years of corn yield data were used to calibrate a modified version of the CERES‐Maize (Version 3.5) model for a commercial field previously divided into four MZs in eastern Illinois. The model performance in simulating corn yield for two hybrids (33G26 and 33J24) at five N levels in two independent years was evaluated. Economically optimum N rates (EONRs) were estimated based on 15 yr of simulation (1989–2003). The model explained approximately 59 and 93% of yield variability during calibration and validation, respectively. The model performed well at non‐zero N rates, with most of the simulation errors being <10%. Model‐estimated EONR varied from 70 to 250 kg ha −1 . Economic analyses indicated that applying N fertilizer at year‐, hybrid‐, and MZ‐specific EONR had the potential to increase net return by an average of US$49 (33G26) or US$52 (33J24) ha −1 over a URN (uniform rate N) application at 170 kg ha −1 . Applying average hybrid‐ and MZ‐specific EONRs across years did not consistently improve economic returns over URN application; however, applying the hybrid‐ and MZ‐specific N rates that maximized long‐term net returns would improve economic return by an average of US$22 (33G26) and US$14 (33J24) ha −1
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1