Publication | Closed Access
Transit’s Value-Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values
275
Citations
8
References
2002
Year
Commuter Rail ServicesTraffic CongestionTransport SectorSocial SciencesTransportation PolicyValue-added EffectsTransport InfrastructureTransportation Systems AnalysisTransportation EngineeringTransit-oriented DevelopmentPublic PolicyEconomicsCommercial Land ValuesPublic Transportation ManagementUrban PlanningTransportation GeographyPublic TransportUrban EconomicsReal Estate DevelopmentBusinessAffordable HousingUrban MobilityTransport Economics
Transit‑oriented development is promoted to reduce congestion, support affordable housing, and curb sprawl. The study seeks to quantify how proximity to rail stations and freeway interchanges affects commercial land values to aid developers, lenders, and transit agencies in designing value‑capture financing. The authors modeled the impact of proximity to light and commuter rail stations and freeway interchanges on commercial‑retail and office property values in Santa Clara County. Hedonic price models show that proximity to light rail yields about 23 % value gains, while proximity within 0.25 mi of commuter rail in a business district yields over 120 % gains, offering evidence useful for developers, lenders, and transit agencies.
Transit-oriented development has gained favor as a means of reducing traffic congestion, promoting affordable housing, and curbing sprawl. The effects of proximity to light and commuter rail stations are modeled as are the effects of freeway interchanges on commercial-retail and office properties in fast-growing Santa Clara County, California. From hedonic price models, substantial capitalization benefits were found, on the order of 23% for a typical commercial parcel near a light rail transit stop and more than 120% for commercial land in a business district and within 0.25 mi of a commuter rail station. Such evidence is of use not only to developers and lenders but also to transit agencies facing lawsuits over purported negative externalities associated with being near rail. It can also help in the design of creative financing, such as value-capture programs.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1