Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2011 · 175 citations · 34 references
DentistryMaxillofacial RadiologyOral RadiologyDental RadiologyImplant SurgeryMaxillofacial ImagingCone Beam Computed Tomography InterpretationDental Implant ImagingMaxillary Sinus EvaluationMaxillofacial RadiographySinus ImagingSinus RadiographyDental ImplantsMaxillary Sinus MorphologyMaxillary Sinus PathologyMaxillary Sinus PneumatizationMaxillofacial ScanningSinus Floor AnatomySinus Floor MorphologySinus Mucosal Thickening
The study aims to determine the prevalence of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions in CBCT scans used for dental implant planning. A cross‑sectional prevalence study of 500 consecutive maxillary CBCT exams, independently evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists for sinus variations and lesions. Pneumatization (83.2%), antral septa (44.4%), hypoplasia (4.8%) and exostosis (2.6%) were common variations, while mucosal thickening (≤3 mm 54.8%, >3 mm 62.6%) and polypoid lesions (21.4%) were frequent lesions, highlighting the importance of CT in implant planning.
Abstract Objective To evaluate the presence of anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus in cone beam computed tomography ( CBCT ) of the maxilla required for dental implant planning. Material and methods This transversal prevalence study evaluated a sample of 500 consecutive CBCT exams. The inclusion criteria were CBCT exams of the maxilla required for dental implant planning. The CBCT exams were independently evaluated by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists who assessed the presence of anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus. As most of the CBCT exams did not allow the evaluation of the area close to the maxillary sinus roof, anatomic variations that take place at this site were not assessed. Results The anatomic variations detected were pneumatization (83.2%), antral septa (44.4%), hypoplasia (4.8%), and exostosis (2.6%). The identified lesions were mucosal thickening (≤3 mm in 54.8% and >3 mm in 62.6%), polypoid lesions (21.4%), discontinuity of the sinus floor (17.4%), air‐fluid level (4.4%), bone thickening of the maxillary sinus wall (3.8%), antroliths (3.2%), discontinuity of the sinus lateral wall (2.6%), sinus opacification (1.8%), and foreign body (1.6%). Conclusion Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus were common findings in CBCT exams of the maxilla required for dental implant planning. As some of these conditions can modify dental implant planning and must require specialized treatment, its recognition is noteworthy in dental practice, and especially in implantology. The amount and significance of the anatomic variations and lesions detected in this study reinforces the importance of computed tomography in preoperative dental implant planning.
34
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
Maxillary and Sinus Implant Reconstructions
Hilt Tatum · Dental Clinics of North America · 1986 · 1.6K citations
Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation
G.R. Seward · Journal of Dentistry · 1983 · 1.6K citations
Dentistry, Oral Radiology, Radiology +12