Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran

268

Citations

20

References

2008

Year

TLDR

Calibration quality is assessed using the P factor (ideally ~1) and D factor (ideally ~0), which together indicate the strength of the calibration‑uncertainty analysis. The SWAT model was calibrated and validated for runoff and sediment in the Beheshtabad and Vanak watersheds using SUFI‑2 in SWAT‑CUP, with performance evaluated by P and D factors based on data from four hydrometric stations per basin. The model achieved fair calibration, with P factors ranging 0.31–0.86 for Beheshtabad and 0.71–0.80 for Vanak, D factors 0.3–1.1 and 0.77–1.16 respectively, and predicted runoff closely matched observed discharge.

Abstract

Abstract The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to model runoff and sediment in the Beheshtabad (3860 km2) and Vanak (3198 km2) watersheds in the northern Karun catchment in central Iran. Model calibration and uncertainty analysis were performed with sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2), which is one of the programs interfaced with SWAT, in the package SWAT-CUP (SWAT Calibration Uncertainty Programs). Two measures were used to assess the goodness of calibration and uncertainty analysis: (a) the percentage of data bracketed by the 95% prediction uncertainty (95PPU) (P factor), and (b) the ratio of average thickness of the 95PPU band to the standard deviation of the corresponding measured variable (D factor). Ideally, the P factor should tend towards 1 with a D factor close to zero. These measures together indicate the strength of the calibration-uncertainty analysis. Runoff and sediment data from four hydrometric stations in each basin were used for calibration and validation. The P factor for Beheshtabad stations ranged from 0.31 to 0.86, while those for Vanak stations were between 0.71 and 0.80. The D factor for Beheshtabad ranged from 0.3 to 1.1, and for Vanak it was 0.77–1.16. These measures indicate a fair model calibration and accounting of uncertainties. The predicted runoff values were quite similar to those for discharge.

References

YearCitations

Page 1