Publication | Open Access
Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets
678
Citations
12
References
2010
Year
Nitric OxideImmunologyImmune RegulationImmunodominanceInnate ImmunityImmune SystemCellular PhysiologyInflammationImmunopathologyPeritoneal CavityMorphogenesisImmune SurveillanceHumoral ImmunityImmune FunctionCell BiologyPhagocyteMolecular ImmunologyDevelopmental BiologyImmune Effector FunctionsMucosal ImmunologyImmune Cell DevelopmentMø SubsetsMedicine
The peritoneal cavity is a distinct immune niche that supplies macrophages for functional research. The study aims to define two distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets in adult mice. Two subsets were identified: a large peritoneal macrophage (LPM) that dominates unstimulated PerC but is lost after LPS or thioglycolate, and a small peritoneal macrophage (SPM) that arises from blood monocytes after stimulation, differs in marker expression, and shows distinct nitric‑oxide responses.
The peritoneal cavity (PerC) is a unique compartment within which a variety of immune cells reside, and from which macrophages (MØ) are commonly drawn for functional studies. Here we define two MØ subsets that coexist in PerC in adult mice. One, provisionally called the large peritoneal MØ (LPM), contains approximately 90% of the PerC MØ in unstimulated animals but disappears rapidly from PerC following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or thioglycolate stimulation. These cells express high levels of the canonical MØ surface markers, CD11b and F4/80. The second subset, referred to as small peritoneal MØ (SPM), expresses substantially lower levels of CD11b and F4/80 but expresses high levels of MHC-II, which is not expressed on LPM. SPM, which predominates in PerC after LPS or thioglycolate stimulation, does not derive from LPM. Instead, it derives from blood monocytes that rapidly enter the PerC after stimulation and differentiate to mature SPM within 2 to 4 d. Both subsets show clear phagocytic activity and both produce nitric oxide (NO) in response to LPS stimulation in vivo. However, their responses to LPS show key differences: in vitro, LPS stimulates LPM, but not SPM, to produce NO; in vivo, LPS stimulates both subsets to produce NO, albeit with different response patterns. These findings extend current models of MØ heterogeneity and shed new light on PerC MØ diversity, development, and function. Thus, they introduce a new context for interpreting (and reinterpreting) data from ex vivo studies with PerC MØ.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1