Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · 1993 · 104 citations · 17 references
Life SciencesAnatomyZoologyComparative AnatomyEvolutionary PaleontologyMammalogyComparative BiomechanicsComparative OsteologyComparative Primate AnatomyFunctional MorphologyLocomotor AdaptationsMammalian LocomotionComparative Limb AnatomyComparative Limb MorphologyComparative SkeletonFossil ClassificationFossil Primate AnatomyMammalian Limb MorphologyMorphological Shape AnalysisPrimate Limb Anatomy
ABSTRACT A striking diversity in limb morphology among fossil sloths suggests that the traditional distinction between extant “tree” sloths and fossil “ground” sloths merits closer scrutiny. Morphologically, xenarthrans (sloths, anteaters, and armadillos) are divergent from other mammalian orders. However, morphological shape indices of aspects of the elbow, hip, and knee joints that clearly discriminate locomotor modes in primates, carnivores, and bovids also succeed in differentiating the fully arboreal, semiarboreal, and terrestrial genera of anteaters. When compared to this extant data base, fossil sloths from both the Pleistocene radiation of the Antilles and the Santacrucian radiation of Argentina exhibit a range of values for these indices comparable to those of primates and anteaters. These results indicate that the diversity of limb structure in fossil sloths is associated with variation in posture and locomotor habits including arboreality, semiarboreality, and terrestriality.
17
ADAPTATION AND THE FORM-FUNCTION COMPLEX
Walter J. Bock, Gerd von Wahlert · Evolution · 1965 · 642 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Zoology +9
Hip structure and locomotion in ambulatory and cursorial carnivores
Farish A. Jenkins, Scott Camazine · Journal of Zoology · 1977 · 207 citations
Life Sciences, Anatomy, Zoology +17
The fayum primate forest revisited
Thomas M. Bown, Mary J. Kraus, Scott L. Wing et al. · Journal of Human Evolution · 1982 · 192 citations