Redistributive Politics and Economic Efficiency

Avinash Dixit, John Londregan

American Political Science Review · 1995 · 383 citations · 14 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Redistributive politics often compensates losers of technical change or competition through subsidies or protection, diverting resources away from more productive uses because income is distributed based on political rather than economic characteristics. The study seeks to show that preventing offsetting transfers to those making inefficient choices is necessary for economic efficiency, and it identifies situations where politically desirable but economically inefficient actors are shielded from consequences. The authors analyze scenarios in which economically inefficient actors possess politically desirable traits that protect them from facing the economic costs of their choices. They find that dynamic inconsistency in redistributive politics drives the inefficient allocation.

Abstract

The political process often compensates the losers from technical change or international competition in an economically inefficient way, namely by subsidizing or protecting declining industries instead of encouraging the movement of resources to other more productive uses. We find that a dynamic inconsistency in the game of redistributive politics contributes to this outcome. To achieve economically efficient outcomes, it is necessary that those making economically inefficient choices not be given offsetting transfers. But the political process distributes income on the basis of political characteristics, which are in general different from the economic characteristics that are rewarded by the market. We identify circumstances in which the inefficient choosers have desirable political characteristics and are therefore immune from threats of having to face the economic consequences of their choices.

References

14