Frontiers in Microbiology · 2015 · 116 citations · 24 references
Life SciencesEnvironmental SciencesMicrobiologyBiosensorsEnvironmental MicrobiologyMicrobial EcologyEnvironmental BiosensingEnvironmental BiosensorsHeavy Metal ContaminationMetal ToxicityMicrobial BiosensorsBiosensor DevelopmentEnvironmental Pollutant DetectionEnvironmental PollutionHeavy Metal DetectionHeavy Metal Ion BiosensorsHeavy Metal SensingReporter GenesYeast Whole-cell Biosensors
This review analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of using eukaryotic microorganisms to design whole-cell biosensors (WCBs) for monitoring environmental heavy metal pollution in soil or aquatic habitats. Basic considerations for designing a eukaryotic WCB are also shown. A comparative analysis of the promoter genes used to design WCBs is carried out, and the sensitivity and reproducibility of the main reporter genes used is also reviewed. Three main eukaryotic taxonomic groups are considered: yeasts, microalgae, and ciliated protozoa. Models that have been widely analyzed as potential WCBs are the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model among yeasts, the Tetrahymena thermophila model for ciliates and Chlamydomonas model for microalgae. The advantages and disadvantages of each microbial group are discussed, and a ranking of sensitivity to the same type of metal pollutant from reported eukaryotic WCBs is also shown. General conclusions and possible future developments of eukaryotic WCBs are reported.
24
Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia
Jean‐Marc Aury, Olivier Jaillon, Laurent Duret et al. · Nature · 2006 · 847 citations · Full text
Macronuclear Genome Sequence of the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a Model Eukaryote
Jonathan A. Eisen, Robert S. Coyne, Martin Wu et al. · PLoS Biology · 2006 · 798 citations · Full text
Framework for Metals Risk Assessment
Anne Fairbrother, Randall Wenstel, Keith Sappington et al. · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · 2007 · 566 citations