Geophysical Research Letters · 2007 · 28 citations · 8 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesGeophysicsEarthquake EngineeringEarthquake PhysicsSeismologyEarthquake MagnitudeEarthquake Scaling LawsEarthquake Magnitude EstimationEarthquake Magnitude ScalingEarthquakesEvent Magnitude EstimationMagnitude CalibrationMagnitude Of Historical EarthquakesMagnitude-scaling RelationsSeismic Network Analysis
We derive empirical magnitude scaling relationships for southern California using a dataset of 59 past earthquakes recorded in southern California by the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) between 1992 and 2003. The events range in magnitude from 3.0 to 7.3. We use the maximum predominant period ( τ p max ) and the peak displacement amplitude (P d ) measured from the first 4 seconds of P‐wave arrivals to determine period‐magnitude and amplitude‐magnitude scaling relationships respectively. Our calibration study shows that the scaling relationships are similar to those derived for northern California. The average error in magnitude estimates is 0.2 magnitude units for events with magnitudes smaller than 4.5 (M < = 4.5), 0.3 magnitude units for events with magnitudes ranging from 4.5 to 6.5 (4.5 < M < = 6.5), and 0.5 magnitude units for events with magnitudes greater than 6.5 (M > 6.5).
8
The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California
R. M. Allen, Hiroo Kanamori · Science · 2003 · 616 citations
ShakeMap manual: technical manual, user's guide, and software guide
David J. Wald, Bruce C. Worden, Vincent Quitoriano et al. · Techniques and methods · 2005 · 287 citations