Krill caught by predators and nets: differences between species and techniques

Abstract

Samples of Antarchc krill collected from 6 seabird species and Antarctic fur seal dunng February 1986 at South Georgia were compared to krill from scientific nets fished in the area at the same time. The length-frequency d~stribution of krill was broadly similar between predators and nets although the krill taken by diving species formed a homogeneous group w h ~c h showed significant differences from knll taken by other predators and by nets There were significant differences In the maturity/sex stage composition between nets and predators; in particular all predator species showed a consistent sex bias towards female krill. Similarities in the knll taken by macaroni [offshore feeding) and gentoo (inshore feeding) penguins and differences between krill taken by penguins and albatrosses suggest that foraging techniques were more important than foraging location in influencing the type of krill in predator diets. Most krill taken by predators were adult; most female krill were sexually active (particularly when allowance is made for lnisclassification bias arising from predator digestion). Because female krill are larger, and probably less manouverable, than males, the biased sex ratio In predator diets at thls t ~m e of year may reflect some comblnat~on of selectivity by predators and superior escape responses of male krill. Overall, adult, sexually a c t ~v e female krill, formlng 4 0 % by number of the local krill population, may comprise 60 to 70";v by number and 75 to 88% by mass of the krill taken by their main seabird and seal predators at South Georgia at the time of peak local demand in February.