Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a comparison of sevoflurane and propofol*

Abstract

This study compared the induction time, haemodynamic changes, recovery characteristics and patient satisfaction for sevoflurane and propofol when used as the main anaesthetic agents for cardioversion. Sixty-one unpremedicated patients scheduled for elective cardioversion were anaesthetised with either inhaled sevoflurane 8% or an intravenous propofol target-controlled infusion set at 6 microg.ml(-1). There was no significant difference in induction time between the two groups: mean (SD) = 90.1(40) s in the sevoflurane group vs. 83.7(35) s in the propofol group. Mean (SD) time to recovery was significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group: 318 (127) s vs.738 (355) s, respectively, p < 0.001. At recovery, the patients in the propofol group had significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures than those in the sevoflurane group, p < 0.001. The incidence of complications was low in both groups, with similar patient satisfaction expressed after the procedure. We conclude that sevoflurane is a suitable choice for anaesthesia for cardioversion and may provide greater haemodynamic stability than a target-controlled infusion of propofol.