International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 1995 · 24 citations · 21 references
NursingMaternal HealthObstetricsMaternal-fetal MedicineObstetric ComplicationsAntenatal AssessmentAntenatal CareObstetric Emergency CareObstetric ManagementPregnancyPrenatal CareObstetric Complications ManagementObstetric Standard Of CarePhysician Practice Patterns
OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric intervention rates between Dutch hospitals. METHODS: A total of 28,934 hospital births under secondary care (specialist care for medium-/high-risk pregnancies) in 1990 were analyzed in a stratified, random sample of Dutch hospitals based on the records of the Dutch Netherlands perinatal database. Comparisons were made of the intervention rates between hospitals. RESULTS: The intervention rates of the various hospitals differed widely. The most striking difference was in the cesarean section (CS) rate for non-vertex first twins, with a range of 0-100% and a mean rate of 47.6%. On average a CS for a term breech was performed in 30.8% of cases and sedation or analgesics were administered in 16.2% of cases. The mean rate of episiotomy for a term breech was 71.5%, the lowest rate being 18.8%. CONCLUSION: Our results show relatively low intervention rates with considerable interhospital variation.
21
Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth
Edward R. Newton · Journal of Human Lactation · 1990 · 993 citations
Nursing, Maternal Health, Obstetrics +12
Variations in Medical Care among Small Areas
John E. Wennberg, Alan M. Gittelsohn · Scientific American · 1982 · 832 citations
Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil
Fernando C. Barros, César G. Victora, J P Vaughan et al. · The Lancet · 1991 · 205 citations