Recurrence of Congenital Heart Defects in Families

TLDR

Knowledge of the familial contribution to congenital heart diseases (CHD) on an individual and population level is sparse. The study estimated an individual’s risk of CHD based on family history and the contribution of family history to overall CHD cases in the population. Using a national Danish cohort of 1.76 million residents linked to multiple health registers, the authors classified CHD phenotypes and estimated recurrence risk ratios and population‑attributable risk. Strong familial clustering was observed, with recurrence risk ratios ranging from 3‑fold to 80‑fold for specific defects, an overall same‑defect RR of 8.15, a crossover RR of 2.68, yet only 2.2 % of all CHD cases were attributable to first‑degree family history.

Abstract

Background— Knowledge of the familial contribution to congenital heart diseases (CHD) on an individual and population level is sparse. We estimated an individual’s risk of CHD given a family history of CHD, as well as the contribution of CHD family history to the total number of CHD cases in the population. Methods and Results— In a national cohort study, we linked all Danish residents to the National Patient Register, the Causes of Death Register, the Danish Central Cytogenetic Register, and the Danish Family Relations Database, yielding 1 763 591 persons born in Denmark between 1977 and 2005, of whom 18 708 had CHD. Individuals with CHD were classified by phenotype. We estimated recurrence risk ratios and population-attributable risk. Among first-degree relatives, the recurrence risk ratio was 79.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.9 to 190) for heterotaxia, 11.7 (95% CI, 8.0 to 17.0) for conotruncal defects, 24.3 (95% CI,12.2 to 48.7) for atrioventricular septal defect, 12.9 (95% CI, 7.48 to 22.2) for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, 48.6 (95% CI, 27.5 to 85.6) for right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, 7.1 (95% CI, 4.5 to 11.1) for isolated atrial septal defect, and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.2 to 5.3) for isolated ventricular septal defect. The overall recurrence risk ratio for the same defect was 8.15 (95% CI, 6.95 to 9.55), whereas it was 2.68 (95% CI, 2.43 to 2.97) for different heart defects. Only 2.2% of heart defect cases in the population (4.2% after the exclusion of chromosomal aberrations) were attributed to CHD family history in first-degree relatives. Conclusions— Specific CHDs showed highly variable but strong familial clustering in first-degree relatives, ranging from 3-fold to 80-fold compared with the population prevalence, whereas the crossover risks between dissimilar cases of CHD were weaker. Family history of any CHD among first-degree relatives accounted for a small proportion of CHD cases in the population.