Evaluating the Operations Underlying Multisensory Integration in the Cat Superior Colliculus

Terrence R. Stanford, Stephan Quessy, Barry E. Stein

Journal of Neuroscience · 2005 · 319 citations · 15 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Superior colliculus multisensory neurons integrate cues across senses, yet the mechanisms driving enhanced responses—especially for spatially congruent, low‑efficacy stimuli—remain poorly understood. The study aimed to evaluate the computations performed by multisensory neurons when combining auditory and visual stimuli. Extracellular recordings from single SC neurons in cats were obtained under visual, auditory, and bimodal stimulation across varying intensities, and responses were compared to a simple summation null model. The results showed that multisensory responses could be superadditive, additive, or subadditive, with superadditivity occurring mainly near threshold intensities and most stimuli following linear summation, underscoring that stimulus efficacy dictates the computation.

Abstract

It is well established that superior colliculus (SC) multisensory neurons integrate cues from different senses; however, the mechanisms responsible for producing multisensory responses are poorly understood. Previous studies have shown that spatially congruent cues from different modalities (e.g., auditory and visual) yield enhanced responses and that the greatest relative enhancements occur for combinations of the least effective modality-specific stimuli. Although these phenomena are well documented, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie them, because no study has systematically examined the operation that multisensory neurons perform on their modality-specific inputs. The goal of this study was to evaluate the computations that multisensory neurons perform in combining the influences of stimuli from two modalities. The extracellular activities of single neurons in the SC of the cat were recorded in response to visual, auditory, and bimodal visual-auditory stimulation. Each neuron was tested across a range of stimulus intensities and multisensory responses evaluated against the null hypothesis of simple summation of unisensory influences. We found that the multisensory response could be superadditive, additive, or subadditive but that the computation was strongly dictated by the efficacies of the modality-specific stimulus components. Superadditivity was most common within a restricted range of near-threshold stimulus efficacies, whereas for the majority of stimuli, response magnitudes were consistent with the linear summation of modality-specific influences. In addition to providing a constraint for developing models of multisensory integration, the relationship between response mode and stimulus efficacy emphasizes the importance of considering stimulus parameters when inducing or interpreting multisensory phenomena.

References

15