Publication | Closed Access
A comparison between free-weight and isokinetic bench pressing
116
Citations
0
References
1985
Year
Muscle FunctionMotor ControlKinesiologyExerciseStrength PropertyIsokinetic Bench PressApplied PhysiologySport PhysiologyHealth SciencesMusculoskeletal FunctionRehabilitationExercise ScienceIsokinetic DataExercise PhysiologyIsokinetic BenchMechanical PerformanceMusculoskeletal InteractionHuman MovementSticking Region
The purpose of the study was to evaluate selected parameters describing performance characteristics of a free-weight and isokinetic bench press. A secondary purpose was an attempt to clarify the technique requirements essential for a successful lift. Parameters describing the free-weight condition were generated from cinematographic data (150 fps) for five trials each at 90 and 75% of the subject's maximal performance (1RM). Isokinetic data were obtained from an instrumented Cybex Power Bench Press at two speeds corresponding to the average speeds for the free-weight conditions. Despite differences, accommodation appeared to occur for both methods when the lifts were performed maximally. A "sticking region" was defined as the portion of the free-weight activity when the subjects' force application was less than the weight of the bar. No significant difference (P less than 0.05) was observed between the 90% 1RM (26.02%) and 75% 1RM (26.94%) mean relative time values for these regions. For the Cybex device, the percentage of the activity which was isokinetic was longer for the slower speeds of rotation (0.47 rad X s-1 = 70%) and steadily decreased until the movement was only 50% isokinetic at 1.74 rad X s-1. The observed relationships between applied force-time data along with anatomical considerations suggest an ideal technique for the lift.