Publication | Closed Access
A Comparison of Phase Organization of Model Segmented Polyurethanes with Different Intersegment Compatibilities
164
Citations
43
References
2008
Year
Macromolecular ChemistryEngineeringMechanical EngineeringBiomedical EngineeringSoft MatterPolymersPolymer MaterialMacromolecular EngineeringMultiblock PolyurethanesPolymer ProcessingPolymer ChemistryMaterials ScienceMode AfmPolymer BlendPolymer EngineeringMacromolecular SciencePhase OrganizationBlock Co-polymersMechanical PropertiesPolymer ScienceSoft SegmentsPolymer CharacterizationModel Segmented PolyurethanesDifferent Intersegment CompatibilitiesPolymer PropertyPolymer Modeling
Three series of chemically well-defined polyurethanes were synthesized with the same hard segments but different soft-segment chemistries of interest in biomedical applications. The multiblock polyurethanes have soft segments composed of either an aliphatic polycarbonate [poly(1,6-hexyl 1,2-ethyl carbonate)], polytetramethylenoxide, or a mixed macrodiol of polyhexamethylenoxide and hydroxyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and the same hard-segment chemistry [4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate and 1,4-butanediol]. Analysis using small-angle X-ray scattering and other methods demonstrates that demixing of the hard and soft segments varies greatly between the three series of copolymers. For example, the PDMS/PHMO-based copolymers exhibit a three-phase, core−shell morphology, while the other two series exhibit a typical two-phase structure. In addition to quantitative measurements of hard/soft-segment demixing for the two-phase copolymers, FTIR spectroscopy was used to assess inter- and intracomponent hydrogen bonding, and tapping mode AFM was used to characterize the nanoscale morphology.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1