Publication | Closed Access
Acute experimental osteomyelitis and abscesses: detection with MR imaging versus CT.
103
Citations
0
References
1990
Year
Emergency RadiologySterile SalineMedical ImagingVersus CtVeterinary PathologyAbdominal ImagingVeterinary SciencePathologyMagnetic ResonanceAcute Experimental OsteomyelitisVeterinary DiagnosticsRadiologic ImagingMedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryRadiologyHealth Sciences
Acute experimental osteomyelitis and abscesses were induced in the proximal tibia and surrounding soft tissues, respectively, in 67 New Zealand white rabbits. Fifty-three rabbits were injected with a Staphylococcus aureus solution and 26, with sterile saline in tibial medullae and/or surrounding soft tissues. Contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed 7 days after inoculation. Immediately after imaging, the animals were killed and necropsy was performed. MR imaging was more sensitive than CT in the detection of osteomyelitis (94% vs 66%, P less than .025) and abscesses (97% vs 52%, P less than .001). MR imaging was equally specific as CT in the exclusion of osteomyelitis (93% vs 97%, chi 2 = 0) but less specific than CT in the exclusion of abscesses (77% vs 100%, P less than .025). The overall accuracy of MR imaging was somewhat, although not significantly, greater than that of CT in the detection of both osteomyelitis (93% vs 80%) and abscesses (87% vs 75%).