Menstrual History as a Determinant of Current Bone Density in Young Athletes

Barbara L. Drinkwater

JAMA · 1990 · 394 citations · 15 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study measured bone density in 97 young athletes at seven sites using single‑ and dual‑photon absorptiometry and ranked menstrual patterns on a 1–9 scale to assess their potential adverse effect on bone. Vertebral density was significantly inversely related to menstrual pattern severity (r = –0.43), athletes with consistently regular cycles had higher lumbar densities than those with intermittent oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea, and both groups exceeded those who never had regular cycles, with body weight becoming a stronger predictor as irregularity increased, and the combination of pattern and weight explaining 43 % of lumbar density variation, suggesting residual effects of prolonged menstrual irregularity. JAMA 1990;263:545‑548.

Abstract

The relationship of prior menstrual irregularities and current menstrual status to the bone density of 97 young athletes was determined at seven sites using single- and dual-photon absorptiometry. Menstrual patterns were ranked on a scale of 1 to 9 in terms of their potential adverse affect on bone. Only vertebral density was significantly related to menstrual patterns (<i>r</i>= —.43). Women who had always had regular cycles had higher lumbar densities (1.27 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) than those with a history of oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea interspersed with regular periods (1.18 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). The lumbar density of both groups exceeded that of women who had never had regular cycles (1.05 g/cm<sup>2</sup>). Body weight became more important as a predictor variable as the severity of menstrual irregularities increased. The combination of menstrual pattern and body weight predicted 43% of the total variation in lumbar density. These data suggest that extended periods of oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea may have a residual effect on lumbar bone density. (<i>JAMA</i>. 1990;263:545-548)

References

15