THE SUPERORGANIC IN AMERICAN CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY∗

Scott Duncan

Annals of the Association of American Geographers · 1980 · 261 citations · 31 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The superorganic mode of explanation in cultural geography treats culture as an ontological entity above individuals, a view first outlined by Kroeber, Lowie, White, and Sauer, and insists that explanations must be framed at the cultural level rather than the individual level. The paper aims to critically examine the central assumptions of this superorganic theory after demonstrating its support among influential cultural geographers. The analysis focuses on the theory’s assumptions of separating individuals from culture, reifying culture, assuming internal homogeneity, characterizing culture as modal personality types and idealized values, and implicitly applying Pavlovian conditioning.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The superorganic mode of explanation in cultural geography reifies the nation of culture assigning it ontological status and causative power. This theory of culture was outlined by anthropologists Alfred Kroeber and Robert Lowie during the first quarter of the twentieth century, later elaborated by Leslie White, and passed on to Carl Sauer and a number of his students at Berkeley. In this theory culture is viewed as an entity above man, not reducible to the actions of individuals, mysteriously responding to laws of its own. Explanation, it is claimed must be phrased in terms of the cultural level not in terms of individuals. After demonstrating that a number of influential cultural geographers support this theory the central assumptions of the theory are subjected to a critical analysis. These assumptions include the separation of the individual from culture, the reification of culture, the assumption of internal homogeneity within a culture, the characterization of culture as a configuration of modal personality types and idealized values, and the implicit use of Pavlovian conditioning theory.

References

31