European Journal of Communication · 2004 · 155 citations · 16 references
Social SciencesPolitical CommunicationPolitical ScienceMedia StudiesMedia TheoryRussian StudiesMass MediaMedia FreedomNews MediaPress FreedomRussian Media StudiesRussian PoliticsCensorship In RussiaMedia Transformation HistoryMediatization Of PoliticsPolitical Media DiscourseRussian JournalismRussian PressRussian RadioRussian Television
The article investigates the current state of press freedom in Russia post‑glasnost and uses Russia’s media transformation to refine distinctions among non‑democratic mass political media systems. It employs comparative analysis and political‑science typologies, including Siebert et al.’s Four Theories of the Press, to compare Russian media with other authoritarian regimes and highlight state control as the main threat. The study finds that Russian media under Putin are not as dire as the pre‑glasnost era or as bad as some NGOs claim, and that they resemble other authoritarian media systems rather than being unique.
This article seeks to answer two interrelated questions: where does press freedom stand in Russia more than 15 years after Mikhail Gorbachev’s policy glasnost began? and, what does Russia’s media transformation tell us about our understanding of mass political media systems? It is argued that while the Russian media are suffering under the presidency of Vladimir Putin, circumstances are in no way as dire as in the pre-Gorbachev Soviet period, nor even as bad as some journalists’ rights organizations would have it. By using comparative analysis, and incorporating political science literature that offers typologies of non-democratic systems of governance, the article demonstrates that contemporary Russian media find much in common with authoritarian regimes across the world and are not sui generis as some have argued. In the process, the author attempts to resurrect some of the important distinctions made in Siebert et al.’s much maligned Four Theories of the Press, particularly the role of the state as the leading threat to media freedom. The author also argues for the need to distinguish more clearly between different types of non-democratic mass political media systems.
16
What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not
Philippe C. Schmitter, Terry Lynn Karl · Journal of democracy · 1991 · 1.6K citations
Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes
Choice Reviews Online · 2001 · 726 citations
Simeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh, Tatiana Nenova et al. · The Journal of Law and Economics · 2003 · 693 citations
Alfred McClung Lee, Ben H. Bagdikian · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1984 · 666 citations