Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

How Many Interviews Are Enough?

Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, Laura Johnson · Field Methods · 2005 · 19.4K citations

Social Sciences, Gender Studies, Statistics +16

Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note

Glenn A. Bowen · Qualitative Research · 2008 · 2.7K citations · Full text

Social Sciences, Sociology, Communities Of Practice +12

Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding

Donald L. Patrick, Laurie B. Burke, Chad Gwaltney et al. · Value in Health · 2011 · 1.1K citations · Full text

Pharmacy, Quality Management, Good Clinical Practice +16

Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Ethan Basch, Bryce B. Reeve, Sandra A. Mitchell et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2014 · 1.1K citations · Full text

Pharmacy, Oncology, Cancer Control +15

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessments and Patient-Physician Communication

Symone Detmar, Martin J. Muller, Jan H. Schornagel et al. · JAMA · 2002 · 1K citations

Medicine, Oncology, Health Communication +16