Multivariate Behavioral Research · 2014 · 111 citations · 32 references
BusinessBiostatisticsMethod ValidationPsychometricsStatistical ModelingBootstrap MethodsModel Fit AssessmentModel FittingMonte Carlo SimulationSimulation MethodsFit Index EvaluationMean Squared ErrorMean Squared Error EstimationRoot Mean Squared Error AnalysisSimulation-based Fit Evaluation
Accepting that a model will not exactly fit any empirical data, global approximate fit indices quantify the degree of misfit. Recent research (Chen et al., 2008) has shown that using fixed conventional cut-points for approximate fit indices can lead to decision errors. Instead of using fixed cut-points for evaluating approximate fit indices, this study focuses on the meaning of approximate fit and introduces a new method to evaluate approximate fit indices. Millsap (2012) introduced a simulation-based method to evaluate approximate fit indices. A limitation of Millsap's work was that a rather strong assumption of multivariate normality was implied in generating simulation data. In this study, the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure (Bollen & Stine, 1993) is proposed to supplement the former study. When data are non-normal, the conclusions derived from Millsap's (2012) simulation method and the Bollen-Stine method can differ. Examples are given to illustrate the use of the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure for evaluating RMSEA. Comparisons are made with the simulation method. The results are discussed, and suggestions are given for the use of proposed method.
32
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Keith E. Muller, Jacob Cohen · Technometrics · 1989 · 83.9K citations
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Michael W. Browne, Robert Cudeck · Sociological Methods & Research · 1992 · 25.2K citations