International Journal of Biomedical Imaging · 2006 · 22 citations · 17 references
ComputingComputer ScienceRadiologyAlgorithmsParallel AlgorithmsParallel ComputingComputed Tomography PhysicsData ParallelismParallel Algorithm DesignParallel Computing SystemsParallel Numerical MethodsParallel Performance AnalysisBackprojectionCone-beam Computed Tomography (Cbct)Parallel Computing ArchitecturesParallel Computing PerformanceParallel Imaging Reconstruction
For spiral cone-beam CT, parallel computing is an effective approach to resolving the problem of heavy computation burden. It is well known that the major computation time is spent in the backprojection step for either filtered-backprojection (FBP) or backprojected-filtration (BPF) algorithms. By the cone-beam cover method [1], the backprojection procedure is driven by cone-beam projections, and every cone-beam projection can be backprojected independently. Basing on this fact, we develop a parallel implementation of Katsevich's FBP algorithm. We do all the numerical experiments on a Linux cluster. In one typical experiment, the sequential reconstruction time is 781.3 seconds, while the parallel reconstruction time is 25.7 seconds with 32 processors.
17
L.A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, J. W. Kress · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · 1984 · 6.2K citations
Introduction to parallel computing
Choice Reviews Online · 2004 · 1.9K citations
A general cone-beam reconstruction algorithm
Ge Wang, T. H. Lin, Ping Cheng et al. · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 1993 · 331 citations