Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2005 · 23 citations · 21 references
MedicineSurgeryUrologyGastroenterologyGeneral SurgeryUrodynamicsAbdominal SurgeryBowel Continence AssessmentBowel Function AssessmentColorectal SurgeryFecal IncontinenceGastrointestinal SurgeryAnal ManometryAnal Sphincter ExaminationAnal Sphincter ImagingAnorectal UltrasonographyFecal Incontinence Severity AssessmentInternal Anal SphincterManometryPostoperative Fecal Incontinence
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to assess the integrity of the anal sphincters after handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis performed with the help of a Scott retractor. For this purpose the anal sphincters were visualized with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography. METHODS: Patients undergoing a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were included. Before and six months after the procedure, the length and volume of both sphincters were assessed with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography, and anal manometry was performed. Continence scores were determined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a colonic pouch and 13 patients with an ileal pouch were examined. Six months after the procedure, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography showed significant alterations of the internal anal sphincter in eight patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (53 percent) and in eight patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (62 percent). These alterations were characterized by asymmetry or thinning. No defects were seen in the colonic pouch group, but, in two patients with an ileal pouch, a small defect in the internal anal sphincter was found. A decrease in internal anal sphincter volume was seen only in patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.009). In both groups the length of the internal anal sphincter and the length, thickness, and volume of the external anal sphincter remained the same. After the procedure a reduction of maximum anal resting pressure was found in both groups (colonic pouch: P < 0.001, ileal pouch: P = 0.001). Maximum anal squeeze pressure was reduced in only patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.006). The observed alterations of the internal anal sphincter and the manometric findings showed no correlation with the postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores. CONCLUSION: Handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis, performed with the help of a Scott retractor, only rarely leads to internal anal sphincter defects, but three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography shows alterations of the internal anal sphincter in 57 percent of the patients. No correlation was observed between these alterations and the functional outcome.
21
Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.
A G Parks, R J Nicholls · BMJ · 1978 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Surgery, Bowel Management +10
Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma
R Parc, Emmanuel Tiret, P Frileux et al. · British journal of surgery · 1986 · 426 citations
Techniques for Very Low Anastomosis
A G Parks · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1972 · 198 citations · Full text
Comparison of J-Pouch and Coloplasty Pouch for Low Rectal Cancers
Yik‐Hong Ho, Steven R. Brown, Siu-Meng Heah et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2002 · 176 citations · Full text
Medicine, Plastic Surgery, Surgery +17