Voice Activity and Participation Profile

TLDR

Traditional clinical voice evaluation focuses primarily on the severity of voice impairment, with little emphasis on the impact of voice disorders on the individual’s quality of life. The study develops a 28‑item tool to assess perceived voice problems, activity limitations, and participation restrictions based on the ICF‑2 Beta‑1 framework. The questionnaire was administered to 40 dysphonic patients and 40 normal‑voice controls. Dysphonic participants reported significantly greater perceived voice problems, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, with these perceptions correlating strongly with each other but weakly with objective acoustic measures, underscoring the need to assess quality‑of‑life impacts in voice disorder management.

Abstract

Traditional clinical voice evaluation focuses primarily on the severity of voice impairment, with little emphasis on the impact of voice disorders on the individual’s quality of life. This study reports the development of a 28-item assessment tool that evaluates the perception of voice problem, activity limitation, and participation restriction using the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps-2 Beta-1 concept (World Health Organization, 1997). The questionnaire was administered to 40 subjects with dysphonia and 40 control subjects with normal voices. Results showed that the dysphonic group reported significantly more severe voice problems, limitation in daily voice activities, and restricted participation in these activities than the control group. The study also showed that the perception of a voice problem by the dysphonic subjects correlated positively with the perception of limitation in voice activities and restricted participation. However, the self-perceived voice problem had little correlation with the degree of voice-quality impairment measured acoustically and perceptually by speech pathologists. The data also showed that the aggregate scores of activity limitation and participation restriction were positively correlated, and the extent of activity limitation and participation restriction was similar in all except the job area. These findings highlight the importance of identifying and quantifying the impact of dysphonia on the individual’s quality of life in the clinical management of voice disorders.