Publication | Closed Access
Classification and misclassification in sexing the Black femur by discriminant function analysis
71
Citations
17
References
1982
Year
Black FemurAnthropometric IndicatorOsteoporosisOrthopaedic SurgerySocial SciencesGross AnatomyBody CompositionBioarchaeologyGender StudiesBiomechanicsBlack WomenSex DifferencesOsteoarthritisGeneral Size FactorBone RemodelingBiostatisticsSex AssessmentAllometric StudyBone DensitySex DifferenceBone ImagingDiscriminant Function AnalysisBody SizeMedicineSkeletal Imaging
Stepwise discriminant function analysis for sex assessment was applied to 130 North American Black femora. The measurements included femoral length and three midshaft dimensions likely to be preserved in archaeologically-derived and forensic remains. The method correctly assigned sex for 76.4% of the sample (range 70.8-81.5%). This compares favorably with results achieved with other skeletal parts; it also compares favorably with results using the femur in sexing other racial groups. Among our other conclusions are: (1) a "general size factor" is one of major significance in correct classification and in misclassification of sex, and most misclassified individuals are anomalous for this factor; (2) the inconsistency in the relation between circumference and femoral length, which characterizes the remaining misclassified individuals, suggests that anomalous functional demands of body weight/musculature are at fault, and affect circumference more than length; and (3) discriminant function analysis of the same variables in Whites produced similar results, suggesting that sex overrides race in sex assessment; this was confirmed by cross-validating the predictive accuracy of Black discriminant function coefficients on White data, and vice versa.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1