Mechanical properties and morphology of impact modified polypropylene-wood flour composites

TLDR

Maleated elastomers are expected to form a flexible interphase around wood particles, thereby improving impact strength. This study investigates the mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour composites incorporating various impact modifiers and maleated polypropylene as a compatibilizer. The composites were fabricated with ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymers (EPDM), a maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS–MA), and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer, and the impact modifiers were dispersed in the PP matrix.

Abstract

The mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour (PP/WF) composites with different impact modifiers and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer have been studied. Two different ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymers (EPDM) and one maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS–MA) have been used as impact modifiers in the PP/WF systems. All three elastomers increased the impact strength of the PP/WF composites but the addition of maleated EPDM and SEBS gave the greatest improvements in impact strength. Addition of MAPP did not affect the impact properties of the composites but had a positive effect on the composite unnotched impact strength when used together with elastomers. Tensile tests showed that MAPP had a negative effect on the elongation at break and a positive effect on tensile strength. The impact modifiers were found to decrease the stiffness of the composites. Scanning electron microscopy showed that maleated EPDM and SEBS had a stronger affinity for the wood surfaces than did the unmodified EPDM. The maleated elastomers are, therefore, expected to form a flexible interphase around the wood particles giving the composites better impact strength. MAPP further enhanced adhesion between WF and impact-modified PP systems. EPDM and EPDM–MA rubber domains were homogeneously dispersed in the PP matrix, the diameter of domains being between 0.1–1 μm. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 67:1503–1513, 1998