A comparison of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba caught by nets and taken by macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus:evidence for selection?

Abstract

Using stomach lavage samples from macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus Brandt breeding at Bird Island, South Georgia and concurrent net samples caught within the penguin forag-Lng range, we examined the potential selection of different length and maturity stages of Anta1cti.c krill Euphausia superba Dana. 'Using Monte Carlo randomlsed simulation techn~ques, w e also determined the probability of obtaining length-frequency distributions of krill different from that obtained in the net samples. The krill taken by the macaroni penguins differed significantly from those caught in the nets. Small krill(28 to 38 mm) were absent from the stomach samples, whereas large krill(58 to 62 mm) were more abundant. Random sampling using Monte Carlo simulation techniques produced lengthfrequency distributions that were statistically different from the origlnal distribution of krill caught in nets on 76 out of 100 tr~als. Nevertheless, these differences were smaller than those found between the penguin samples and net samples. Comparison of krill maturity stages showed that krill taken by macaroni pengulns contained 3 times as many female a s male knll, whereas krdl caught in nets contained nearly equal proportions. The differences in size and maturity of krill taken by penguins are discussed in terms of aggregated random sampling, prey selection by predators, and evasion by krill of predators and nets. We conclude that the differences are unlikely to b e accounted for simply by sampling anomalies; the differences are more Likely to relate to penguins selecting larger, nutritionally superior krill, but might also reflect differential escape responses of particular classes of knll when evading penguins or nets.