On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness

TLDR

The paper investigates the boundary between calculative and noncalculative action, arguing that they are distinct yet mutually constitutive and that both creating and resisting qualculation require effort. The authors employ the concept of qualculation, redefining calculation to include judgment, and identify two strategies—rarefaction, which withdraws qualculative resources, and proliferation, which overloads them—to achieve nonqualculability.

Abstract

In this paper we explore the boundary between calculative and noncalculative action by arguing that these are separate but mutually constitutive. By using the notion of qualculation, a neologism coined by Cochoy, we redefine the notion of calculation to include judgment. We then argue that making qualculability is not trivial: that it takes effort to create calculation and judgment. But it also takes effort to consider nonqualculability. Two strategies for achieving nonqualculability are identified, those of rarefaction and proliferation. Rarefaction, illustrated by the cases of Quaker worship and selfless love or agapè, works by withdrawing all qualculative resources. Conversely, proliferation, illustrated by the attribution of cause and responsibility after railway accidents, and by a major television fund-raiser, the ‘Téléthon’, works to impede calculation by an overload of qualculative resources.