Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2003 · 921 citations · 55 references
Life SciencesCell BiologyMolecular BiologyCell AdhesionSurface ChemistrySurface ScienceBiomolecular InterfacesCell Adhesion ReceptorsCell-matrix AdhesionNanostructured SurfacesProtein AdsorptionSurface AdsorptionAntibody Binding SpecificityCell Adhesion To FibronectinFibronectin AdsorptionGold Surface FunctionalizationIntegrin BindingIntegrin-ligand BindingProtein Adsorption To BiomaterialsProtein-surface Interactions
Integrin-mediated adhesion to proteins adsorbed on synthetic surfaces anchors cells and triggers signaling, while fibronectin adsorption alters its conformation and ability to support adhesion. The study investigates how surface chemistry of alkanethiol SAMs on gold modulates fibronectin adsorption, integrin binding, and cell adhesion. Self‑assembled monolayers of alkanethiols with CH₃, OH, COOH, and NH₂ termini on gold were employed to probe fibronectin conformation, integrin binding, and cell adhesion. Antibody binding to fibronectin’s central cell‑binding domain followed the order OH > COOH = NH₂ > CH₃, mirroring α5β1 integrin affinity and cell adhesion strength, while αV integrin preferred COOH surfaces, demonstrating α5β1 specificity for NH₂ and OH‑modified SAMs. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., J Biomed Mater Res 66A: 247–259.
Abstract Integrin‐mediated cell adhesion to proteins adsorbed onto synthetic surfaces anchors cells and triggers signals that direct cell function. In the case of fibronectin (Fn), adsorption onto substrates of varying properties alters its conformation/structure and its ability to support cell adhesion. In the present study, self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkanethiols on gold were used as model surfaces to investigate the effects of surface chemistry on Fn adsorption, integrin binding, and cell adhesion. SAMs presenting terminal CH 3 , OH, COOH, and NH 2 functionalities modulated adsorbed Fn conformation as determined through differences in the binding affinities of monoclonal antibodies raised against the central cell‐binding domain (OH > COOH = NH 2 > CH 3 ). Binding of α 5 β 1 integrin to adsorbed Fn was controlled by SAM surface chemistry in a manner consistent with antibody binding (OH > COOH = NH 2 > CH 3 ), whereas α V integrin binding followed the trend: COOH >> OH = NH 2 = CH 3 , demonstrating α 5 β 1 integrin specificity for Fn adsorbed onto the NH 2 and OH SAMs. Cell adhesion strength to Fn‐coated SAMs correlated with α 5 β 1 integrin binding (OH > COOH = NH 2 > CH 3 ), and experiments with function‐perturbing antibodies demonstrated that this receptor provides the dominant adhesion mechanism in this cell model. This work establishes an experimental framework to analyze adhesive mechanisms controlling cell‐surface interactions and provides a general strategy of surface‐directed control of adsorbed protein activity to manipulate cell function in biomaterial and biotechnological applications. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 66A: 247–259, 2003
55
Marc D. Porter, Thomas B. Bright, David L. Allara et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1987 · 3.1K citations
Engineering Cell Shape and Function
Rahul Singhvi, Amit Kumar, Gabriel P. López et al. · Science · 1994 · 1.4K citations
J. Y. Martin, Zvi Schwartz, Thomas W. Hummert et al. · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · 1995 · 1.1K citations